Top Video Viral
I’m going to own up to it — I have stared at that little mystery dent on the side of a milk jug more times than I can count. You know the one. Perfectly round, a little sunken in, sitting there like it knows a secret. And apparently, it does. If you’re anything like me (and most people), you probably took it to be some sort of quirk of the plastic molding process, or, perhaps, just… decorative? But nope. That circular dent has a job. A smart one.
So grab your cereal, pour some milk, and let’s dig into the curious case of the milk jug dent.
Why There’s a Round Dent in the Bottom of Milk Jugs
That circular dent on your milk jug isn’t some manufacturing mishap or cut corners in the design process. It’s there for a combination of safety, function, and structural integrity. Here’s the rundown:
Buffer for Expansion Due to Pressure Changes
Let’s begin with the most practical: pressure.
Milk, after all, is a perishable item, isn’t it? It has to be kept at cold temperatures. And like all liquids, milk expands or contracts a little when the temperature changes (for example, from a warm truck ride to a cold fridge). The round dent accommodates those temperature and pressure shifts with flexibility.
Without that little feature? The jug may swell outward, crack or in extreme cases even burst — particularly if it’s frozen. The dent gives an area that can bubble out a bit if required. It’s the milk jug’s ever-present stress ball.
Dampening Shock to Avoid Splits
Ever spilled a jug of milk on accident?
Yeah, me too. The dent also serves as a sort of shock absorber. When a jug falls to the floor (or even just gets abused at the grocery store), the recessed circle helps absorb and redistribute the impact energy.
That design reduces cracking and spillage — a godsend if you’ve ever had to clean up a milk puddle and know how messy and annoying that can be. And when margins are razor thin in industry, avoiding even a few cracked jugs during transport can equal real savings.
Retention of Structure Without Any Additional Plastic
Here’s something you weren’t expecting: the dent makes the jug more resilient using less plastic.
It’s like the ridges on a cardboard box, or the arch design in architecture. That indent provides structural support; it reinforces the side panel. Rather than thickening (and making more expensive) the plastic walls, they add the dent — to maintain strength while keeping the jug light.
This is good engineering on a budget. As if duct tape and geometry had a child.
All right, this one is a little bonkers.
Sometimes, if milk is beginning to spoil and the bacteria start to multiply, they can release gases that create pressure inside the jug. With that pressure in place, the dent will start to pop out.
So if you ever see a jug where the dent is puffed out or looks otherwise abnormal, don’t ignore it. That might be your milk crying out, “Hey! I’ve turned!” We know that not every dent bulge indicates bad milk, by the way, but it is a clever early warning system. And it’s certainly not an expectation for the average Persona
But Why This Specific Shape?
Why a circle, though? Why not a triangle or a square?
It turns out circles are inherently stronger shapes for distributing pressure. There are no sharp corners to focus stress. Instead, pressure transfers evenly around a circular edge, which is why it is the ideal shape for a flex-point in a jug that frequently encounters temperature shifts, handling and stacking.
From a manufacturing perspective, circles are also simple: They’re easy to mold and repeat hundreds of millions of times on identical containers. A tour de force of symmetry, simplicity, and science.
Other Hidden Design Details of Milk Jugs
While we’re nerding out over jug design, here are a few more things you likely never noticed:
The handle hole isn’t only for grip — the hole also minimizes the amount of plastic used in the design, without a loss of function.
Those little bumps at the base help the jug balance, even on somewhat wonky shelves.
Cap color can sometimes indicate fat content — blue for 2 percent, red for whole, etc. — depending on the brand and region.
It’s kind of remarkable how much care goes into something we all take for granted.
The Dent and International Hour — Environmental Benefits
Okay, let’s touch on sustainability.
Since the dent lets the jug be thinner and use less plastic while remaining sturdy, it contributes to an overall reduction in plastic. That means:
Less plastic waste
Easier recycling
Transportation with lower weight (which translates to fuel savings)
In other words, the dent isn’t only clever — it’s a low-key eco-warrior doing its bit. An itsy bitsy champion in the war on waste.
Next Time You Pour a Glass…
Just consider: this little design element that you’ve probably overlooked your entire life is doing double time to:
Keep your milk fresh
Protect against leaks
Reduce environmental impact
Prevent the dairy industry from losing billions
Wild stuff for something you never gave a second glance, huh?
The circular dent is the unsung background character of your morning. Always there. Quietly doing its job. Never asking for recognition. Just saving your fridge (and floor) from disaster.
source: The Hand Prop Room
Now, I’m not saying you’re going to win a trivia contest with that little nugget, but when you next reach for a jug and catch that little dent in the side, tip it a nod. It’s not some random dimple. It’s engineering genius cast into plastic.
And hey — if you ever find yourself at a party where the conversation dries up, just slip in the words “Did you know the dent in a milk jug can be used to detect spoilage?” Instant attention. You’re welcome.
So grab your cereal, pour some milk, and let’s dig into the curious case of the milk jug dent.
Why There’s a Round Dent in the Bottom of Milk Jugs
That circular dent on your milk jug isn’t some manufacturing mishap or cut corners in the design process. It’s there for a combination of safety, function, and structural integrity. Here’s the rundown:
Buffer for Expansion Due to Pressure Changes
Let’s begin with the most practical: pressure.
Milk, after all, is a perishable item, isn’t it? It has to be kept at cold temperatures. And like all liquids, milk expands or contracts a little when the temperature changes (for example, from a warm truck ride to a cold fridge). The round dent accommodates those temperature and pressure shifts with flexibility.
Without that little feature? The jug may swell outward, crack or in extreme cases even burst — particularly if it’s frozen. The dent gives an area that can bubble out a bit if required. It’s the milk jug’s ever-present stress ball.
Dampening Shock to Avoid Splits
Ever spilled a jug of milk on accident?
Yeah, me too. The dent also serves as a sort of shock absorber. When a jug falls to the floor (or even just gets abused at the grocery store), the recessed circle helps absorb and redistribute the impact energy.
That design reduces cracking and spillage — a godsend if you’ve ever had to clean up a milk puddle and know how messy and annoying that can be. And when margins are razor thin in industry, avoiding even a few cracked jugs during transport can equal real savings.
Retention of Structure Without Any Additional Plastic
Here’s something you weren’t expecting: the dent makes the jug more resilient using less plastic.
It’s like the ridges on a cardboard box, or the arch design in architecture. That indent provides structural support; it reinforces the side panel. Rather than thickening (and making more expensive) the plastic walls, they add the dent — to maintain strength while keeping the jug light.
This is good engineering on a budget. As if duct tape and geometry had a child.
All right, this one is a little bonkers.
Sometimes, if milk is beginning to spoil and the bacteria start to multiply, they can release gases that create pressure inside the jug. With that pressure in place, the dent will start to pop out.
So if you ever see a jug where the dent is puffed out or looks otherwise abnormal, don’t ignore it. That might be your milk crying out, “Hey! I’ve turned!” We know that not every dent bulge indicates bad milk, by the way, but it is a clever early warning system. And it’s certainly not an expectation for the average Persona
But Why This Specific Shape?
Why a circle, though? Why not a triangle or a square?
It turns out circles are inherently stronger shapes for distributing pressure. There are no sharp corners to focus stress. Instead, pressure transfers evenly around a circular edge, which is why it is the ideal shape for a flex-point in a jug that frequently encounters temperature shifts, handling and stacking.
From a manufacturing perspective, circles are also simple: They’re easy to mold and repeat hundreds of millions of times on identical containers. A tour de force of symmetry, simplicity, and science.
Other Hidden Design Details of Milk Jugs
While we’re nerding out over jug design, here are a few more things you likely never noticed:
The handle hole isn’t only for grip — the hole also minimizes the amount of plastic used in the design, without a loss of function.
Those little bumps at the base help the jug balance, even on somewhat wonky shelves.
Cap color can sometimes indicate fat content — blue for 2 percent, red for whole, etc. — depending on the brand and region.
It’s kind of remarkable how much care goes into something we all take for granted.
The Dent and International Hour — Environmental Benefits
Okay, let’s touch on sustainability.
Since the dent lets the jug be thinner and use less plastic while remaining sturdy, it contributes to an overall reduction in plastic. That means:
Less plastic waste
Easier recycling
Transportation with lower weight (which translates to fuel savings)
In other words, the dent isn’t only clever — it’s a low-key eco-warrior doing its bit. An itsy bitsy champion in the war on waste.
Next Time You Pour a Glass…
Just consider: this little design element that you’ve probably overlooked your entire life is doing double time to:
Keep your milk fresh
Protect against leaks
Reduce environmental impact
Prevent the dairy industry from losing billions
Wild stuff for something you never gave a second glance, huh?
The circular dent is the unsung background character of your morning. Always there. Quietly doing its job. Never asking for recognition. Just saving your fridge (and floor) from disaster.
source: The Hand Prop Room
Now, I’m not saying you’re going to win a trivia contest with that little nugget, but when you next reach for a jug and catch that little dent in the side, tip it a nod. It’s not some random dimple. It’s engineering genius cast into plastic.
And hey — if you ever find yourself at a party where the conversation dries up, just slip in the words “Did you know the dent in a milk jug can be used to detect spoilage?” Instant attention. You’re welcome.
There are a lot of things that spook me in life, and the thought of someone swiping my car ranks pretty high up there. It’s not just the losing my ride part; it’s the feeling of being violated, you know? And just when you think you’ve seen all the clever tricks in the book, from the old penny jammed in the car door handle to the more sophisticated tech hacks, along comes another method that’s so simple, it’s almost genius. Now, we’re talking about a plastic bottle on a tire. Yes, you read that right. A plain, garden-variety plastic water bottle could be a “mark” for car thieves. Mind-boggling, isn’t it?
So, here’s the deal. Some clever (read: sneaky) thieves have figured out that they can use a water bottle to mark a vehicle they’re targeting. But it’s not just about marking; it’s how they use it that’s really cunning. They place the bottle on one of the car’s wheels – specifically, the front passenger side wheel. Why there? Because it’s a spot that’s not easily seen by the driver when getting into the car. The idea is that as the driver starts to pull away, the bottle gets squished, making an unnerving crackling sound. It’s the kind of sound that makes you think, “Did I just roll over something important?”
Most folks, being the curious and responsible drivers they are, would immediately hit the brakes and hop out to see what’s up. And that, my friends, is exactly what the thief is counting on. The moment you step out of the car, with the engine possibly still running, is the perfect opportunity for them to make their move. In a blink, they could jump into the driver’s seat and speed off with your car. Or, if they’re not into grand theft auto, they might just grab any valuables you’ve left inside, like your phone, laptop, or wallet. Either way, you’re left standing there, probably feeling a mix of shock and disbelief, all because of a plastic bottle.
Now, I know what you’re thinking. “That sounds like something out of a movie.” And I get it, I was skeptical too. But the more you think about it, the more it makes a weird kind of sense. It’s all about creating a moment of vulnerability, and unfortunately, it’s pretty effective.
So, what can you do to protect yourself from falling victim to this trick? First and foremost, awareness is key. Now that you know about this tactic, you’re already one step ahead. If you do find a bottle wedged by your tire, resist the urge to immediately jump out and investigate. Take a moment to look around and assess the situation. If it’s safe to do so, remove the bottle from the tire while staying close to the car’s door. Better yet, if you’re unsure or feeling uneasy, drive to a more populated area or call someone over to help.
It’s also a good reminder of the importance of always locking your car, even if you’re just stepping away for a few seconds. Thieves are opportunists, and the less opportunity we give them, the better. And, of course, keeping valuables out of sight is always a good practice. It’s like my grandma used to say, “Out of sight, out of mind.” If a thief doesn’t see anything worth taking, they’re less likely to take the risk.
Lastly, share this info with friends and family. The more people know about these kinds of tricks, the less effective they become. It’s all about looking out for each other.
In a world where we’re constantly bombarded with new information, it’s easy to become numb to warnings and advice. But sometimes, it’s the simplest things that can make a big difference. So, the next time you see a plastic bottle by your tire, remember, it’s not just litter; it could be a sign to pay close attention. Stay safe out there, folks.
So, here’s the deal. Some clever (read: sneaky) thieves have figured out that they can use a water bottle to mark a vehicle they’re targeting. But it’s not just about marking; it’s how they use it that’s really cunning. They place the bottle on one of the car’s wheels – specifically, the front passenger side wheel. Why there? Because it’s a spot that’s not easily seen by the driver when getting into the car. The idea is that as the driver starts to pull away, the bottle gets squished, making an unnerving crackling sound. It’s the kind of sound that makes you think, “Did I just roll over something important?”
Most folks, being the curious and responsible drivers they are, would immediately hit the brakes and hop out to see what’s up. And that, my friends, is exactly what the thief is counting on. The moment you step out of the car, with the engine possibly still running, is the perfect opportunity for them to make their move. In a blink, they could jump into the driver’s seat and speed off with your car. Or, if they’re not into grand theft auto, they might just grab any valuables you’ve left inside, like your phone, laptop, or wallet. Either way, you’re left standing there, probably feeling a mix of shock and disbelief, all because of a plastic bottle.
Now, I know what you’re thinking. “That sounds like something out of a movie.” And I get it, I was skeptical too. But the more you think about it, the more it makes a weird kind of sense. It’s all about creating a moment of vulnerability, and unfortunately, it’s pretty effective.
So, what can you do to protect yourself from falling victim to this trick? First and foremost, awareness is key. Now that you know about this tactic, you’re already one step ahead. If you do find a bottle wedged by your tire, resist the urge to immediately jump out and investigate. Take a moment to look around and assess the situation. If it’s safe to do so, remove the bottle from the tire while staying close to the car’s door. Better yet, if you’re unsure or feeling uneasy, drive to a more populated area or call someone over to help.
It’s also a good reminder of the importance of always locking your car, even if you’re just stepping away for a few seconds. Thieves are opportunists, and the less opportunity we give them, the better. And, of course, keeping valuables out of sight is always a good practice. It’s like my grandma used to say, “Out of sight, out of mind.” If a thief doesn’t see anything worth taking, they’re less likely to take the risk.
Lastly, share this info with friends and family. The more people know about these kinds of tricks, the less effective they become. It’s all about looking out for each other.
In a world where we’re constantly bombarded with new information, it’s easy to become numb to warnings and advice. But sometimes, it’s the simplest things that can make a big difference. So, the next time you see a plastic bottle by your tire, remember, it’s not just litter; it could be a sign to pay close attention. Stay safe out there, folks.
David Letterman was once celebrated as the king of late-night television, known for his sharp wit and ability to keep audiences entertained. However, in today’s cultural climate, not all of his past interviews have aged well. Some of his exchanges, particularly with female guests, are now being reexamined with a more critical eye. One such moment that has resurfaced involves Jennifer Aniston, whose appearance on The Late Show with David Letterman in 2006 left many viewers uncomfortable.
At the time, Aniston was promoting The Break-Up, the romantic comedy she starred in alongside Vince Vaughn, who also co-wrote and produced the film. What started as a routine late-night interview quickly took an awkward turn when Letterman became fixated on Aniston’s legs.
Dressed in a black button-down blouse paired with stylish black shorts, Aniston looked effortlessly chic. However, instead of focusing on her work, Letterman’s attention was elsewhere.
“That’s a tremendous outfit,” he commented, before quickly adding, “and the reason that’s a tremendous outfit is because you have tremendous legs. Fantastic legs. You can only wear that if you have lovely, well-shaped, muscular, lengthy legs.”
The remark left Aniston visibly taken aback. Ever the professional, she laughed it off, brushing it aside by casually explaining that she had chosen shorts simply because of the warm weather.
But Letterman wasn’t done.
As their conversation continued, he circled back to the topic again, saying, “Your legs, you’ve got something there.” The moment was uncomfortable then—and even more cringeworthy when viewed today.
If that weren’t enough, the interview took another unexpected turn when Letterman pressed Aniston about her rumored relationship with Vince Vaughn. He even asked whether it was Vaughn’s idea for her to appear naked in the film. Caught off guard, Aniston hesitated before deflecting, suggesting that Letterman should have asked Vaughn that question when he was on the show.
The pattern continued. Later in the conversation, as Aniston spoke about Vaughn, Letterman once again turned the focus back to her legs, saying, “I can’t get over your legs, I’m telling you. You got something there.”
Then came another questionable remark: “I hope to God somebody at the house is TiVoing this because I can’t stop looking at this shot.” While it wasn’t clear exactly what shot he was referring to, Aniston’s uncomfortable expression suggested she knew exactly where the focus had shifted.
This wasn’t the first time Letterman had made Aniston visibly uncomfortable. One of the most infamous incidents occurred during a 1998 interview, when the late-night host grabbed her neck and sucked on a strand of her hair. Aniston, clearly unsettled, pulled away and awkwardly wiped her hair with the tissue Letterman handed her.
Clips of this incident have resurfaced over the years, sparking outrage each time. A viral tweet from 2021 reignited discussions, with a user sharing the video along with the caption:
“Since we’re talking about David Letterman being awful… is anyone ever going to address this?”
Watching the footage today, many people are shocked by how invasive the moment was. Letterman handed her a tissue after putting his saliva in her hair, as if expecting her to clean up after the bizarre interaction.
Despite these uncomfortable encounters, Aniston continued to make appearances on The Late Show, handling each moment with the same grace and composure that has defined her career. In 2008, two years after her awkward “legs” interview, she returned to the show, this time wearing a chic pink party dress that once again drew attention to her stunning presence.
While promoting her new film Marley & Me, Aniston brought Letterman a special gift—a Brooks Brothers necktie, identical to the one she wore on the cover of GQ Magazine, where she posed in nothing but the red, white, and blue accessory.
“It’s an early Christmas present,” she said, smiling as she handed him the tie.
Letterman wasted no time, immediately swapping out his own tie for the one Aniston had given him. “Funny, the tie said the same thing during the photoshoot,” he quipped, clearly delighted by the gesture.
Aniston playfully assisted him, laughing, “This is exciting, I’m dressing Dave!”
As he adjusted it, he noticed it looked a little too short. “You know what they say about guys with short ties,” he joked, eliciting gasps and laughter from the audience.
While the moment was lighthearted and fun, it underscored a recurring pattern—Letterman’s interviews with female celebrities often included comments that wouldn’t sit well in today’s cultural climate.
Though Jennifer Aniston has never publicly addressed these interactions, they are now being viewed through a new lens. What was once dismissed as “late-night humor” is now the subject of deeper conversations about how women in Hollywood have long been treated in media interviews.
As these clips continue to resurface, audiences are questioning what was once considered acceptable and acknowledging the challenges that female celebrities have faced in the entertainment industry. While Aniston handled each situation with poise, it’s hard to ignore how many of these moments—especially those with Letterman—have aged poorly.
At the time, Aniston was promoting The Break-Up, the romantic comedy she starred in alongside Vince Vaughn, who also co-wrote and produced the film. What started as a routine late-night interview quickly took an awkward turn when Letterman became fixated on Aniston’s legs.
Dressed in a black button-down blouse paired with stylish black shorts, Aniston looked effortlessly chic. However, instead of focusing on her work, Letterman’s attention was elsewhere.
“That’s a tremendous outfit,” he commented, before quickly adding, “and the reason that’s a tremendous outfit is because you have tremendous legs. Fantastic legs. You can only wear that if you have lovely, well-shaped, muscular, lengthy legs.”
The remark left Aniston visibly taken aback. Ever the professional, she laughed it off, brushing it aside by casually explaining that she had chosen shorts simply because of the warm weather.
But Letterman wasn’t done.
As their conversation continued, he circled back to the topic again, saying, “Your legs, you’ve got something there.” The moment was uncomfortable then—and even more cringeworthy when viewed today.
If that weren’t enough, the interview took another unexpected turn when Letterman pressed Aniston about her rumored relationship with Vince Vaughn. He even asked whether it was Vaughn’s idea for her to appear naked in the film. Caught off guard, Aniston hesitated before deflecting, suggesting that Letterman should have asked Vaughn that question when he was on the show.
The pattern continued. Later in the conversation, as Aniston spoke about Vaughn, Letterman once again turned the focus back to her legs, saying, “I can’t get over your legs, I’m telling you. You got something there.”
Then came another questionable remark: “I hope to God somebody at the house is TiVoing this because I can’t stop looking at this shot.” While it wasn’t clear exactly what shot he was referring to, Aniston’s uncomfortable expression suggested she knew exactly where the focus had shifted.
This wasn’t the first time Letterman had made Aniston visibly uncomfortable. One of the most infamous incidents occurred during a 1998 interview, when the late-night host grabbed her neck and sucked on a strand of her hair. Aniston, clearly unsettled, pulled away and awkwardly wiped her hair with the tissue Letterman handed her.
Clips of this incident have resurfaced over the years, sparking outrage each time. A viral tweet from 2021 reignited discussions, with a user sharing the video along with the caption:
“Since we’re talking about David Letterman being awful… is anyone ever going to address this?”
Watching the footage today, many people are shocked by how invasive the moment was. Letterman handed her a tissue after putting his saliva in her hair, as if expecting her to clean up after the bizarre interaction.
Despite these uncomfortable encounters, Aniston continued to make appearances on The Late Show, handling each moment with the same grace and composure that has defined her career. In 2008, two years after her awkward “legs” interview, she returned to the show, this time wearing a chic pink party dress that once again drew attention to her stunning presence.
While promoting her new film Marley & Me, Aniston brought Letterman a special gift—a Brooks Brothers necktie, identical to the one she wore on the cover of GQ Magazine, where she posed in nothing but the red, white, and blue accessory.
“It’s an early Christmas present,” she said, smiling as she handed him the tie.
Letterman wasted no time, immediately swapping out his own tie for the one Aniston had given him. “Funny, the tie said the same thing during the photoshoot,” he quipped, clearly delighted by the gesture.
Aniston playfully assisted him, laughing, “This is exciting, I’m dressing Dave!”
As he adjusted it, he noticed it looked a little too short. “You know what they say about guys with short ties,” he joked, eliciting gasps and laughter from the audience.
While the moment was lighthearted and fun, it underscored a recurring pattern—Letterman’s interviews with female celebrities often included comments that wouldn’t sit well in today’s cultural climate.
Though Jennifer Aniston has never publicly addressed these interactions, they are now being viewed through a new lens. What was once dismissed as “late-night humor” is now the subject of deeper conversations about how women in Hollywood have long been treated in media interviews.
As these clips continue to resurface, audiences are questioning what was once considered acceptable and acknowledging the challenges that female celebrities have faced in the entertainment industry. While Aniston handled each situation with poise, it’s hard to ignore how many of these moments—especially those with Letterman—have aged poorly.
Almost a million Americans a year are affected by blood clots, so it’s worth knowing the signs and symptoms. Blood clots, or thrombosis, can be life-threatening if not treated quickly. Here’s a detailed look at what they feels like, how to identify the symptoms, and when to seek medical help.
1. What is A Blood Clot
A blood clot is a mass or clump of blood that forms in arteries and veins. While clots can be helpful in controlling bleeding after an injury, they can cause serious health issues if they form without an injury to help. “When blood clots form in the deeper system, they can be painful and very dangerous,” says Dr. Luis Navarro, founder of the Vein Treatment Center in New York City.1 These clots, called deep vein thrombosis (DVT), can obstruct blood flow and lead to serious complications.
1. What is A Blood Clot
A blood clot is a mass or clump of blood that forms in arteries and veins. While clots can be helpful in controlling bleeding after an injury, they can cause serious health issues if they form without an injury to help. “When blood clots form in the deeper system, they can be painful and very dangerous,” says Dr. Luis Navarro, founder of the Vein Treatment Center in New York City.1 These clots, called deep vein thrombosis (DVT), can obstruct blood flow and lead to serious complications.
A hush-hush Pentagon briefing intended to share top-secret military plans with Elon Musk was abruptly called off — and it turns out the order came directly from Donald Trump.
According to a bombshell report from Axios, the briefing, focused on potential U.S. strategy in the event of war with China, was canceled after The New York Times leaked its existence on March 20, sparking outrage within the White House. Musk, whose presence had already raised eyebrows due to his deep financial ties to China, found himself at the center of a major internal rift.
Inside the West Wing, Trump reportedly exploded when he learned Musk was to be included in a meeting that would share classified information far beyond his security clearance.
“What the f**k is Elon doing there? Make sure he doesn’t go,”
Trump told aides, according to *Axios*.
Why Was Musk Even Invited?
The meeting was originally arranged to include Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and several senior Pentagon officials, with the goal of briefing Musk on U.S. military preparedness regarding China. While Musk’s SpaceX has major defense contracts and is central to U.S. military satellite and rocket capabilities, his substantial business entanglements in China via Tesla have long raised concern among government insiders.
“POTUS still very much loves Elon,”
a senior official told *Axios*,
“but there are some red lines. Elon has a lot of business in China and he has good relations there, and this briefing just wasn’t the right thing.”
A Public Denial — And a Private Reversal
After the leak triggered headlines, Trump quickly posted a denial on Truth Social, calling the story “completely untrue.”
“They said, incorrectly, that Elon Musk is going to the Pentagon tomorrow to be briefed on any potential ‘war with China.’ How ridiculous? … The story is completely untrue!!!”
But according to Axios, Trump had already canceled the meeting by the time that post went live.
Musk still visited the Pentagon the next day, but the original China-focused content was scrubbed from the agenda. Instead, sources say, the conversation was significantly dialed back, avoiding any discussion of war planning with Beijing.
Musk Responds with Fury
Musk fired back on X (formerly Twitter), slamming the leak and taking direct aim at Pentagon insiders.
“I look forward to the prosecutions of those at the Pentagon who are leaking maliciously false information to NYT. They will be found.”
His post quickly stirred controversy, especially as fallout inside the Defense Department was swift. According to Reuters and Politico, Defense Secretary Hegseth suspended two officials — Dan Caldwell and Darin Selnick — as part of the ongoing leak investigation. Selnick, in particular, was reportedly escorted from the building.
And this leak isn’t an isolated case. The same probe is reportedly examining separate disclosures regarding U.S. operations in the Panama Canal, the Red Sea, and Ukraine intelligence activities.
Tensions Between Allies?
This latest drama underscores the complex, sometimes volatile dynamic between Trump and Musk. While the two men have publicly praised each other, this incident reveals clear limits — especially when it comes to classified military strategy.
For now, it appears Musk is back in the good graces of some inside the administration, but the trust gap has widened. And Trump’s reported fury suggests that, despite personal admiration, the national security line isn’t one he’s willing to let Musk cross.
With multiple investigations underway and major geopolitical issues at stake, the political and defense fallout from this failed briefing could continue to ripple well beyond the walls of the Pentagon.
According to a bombshell report from Axios, the briefing, focused on potential U.S. strategy in the event of war with China, was canceled after The New York Times leaked its existence on March 20, sparking outrage within the White House. Musk, whose presence had already raised eyebrows due to his deep financial ties to China, found himself at the center of a major internal rift.
Inside the West Wing, Trump reportedly exploded when he learned Musk was to be included in a meeting that would share classified information far beyond his security clearance.
“What the f**k is Elon doing there? Make sure he doesn’t go,”
Trump told aides, according to *Axios*.
Why Was Musk Even Invited?
The meeting was originally arranged to include Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and several senior Pentagon officials, with the goal of briefing Musk on U.S. military preparedness regarding China. While Musk’s SpaceX has major defense contracts and is central to U.S. military satellite and rocket capabilities, his substantial business entanglements in China via Tesla have long raised concern among government insiders.
“POTUS still very much loves Elon,”
a senior official told *Axios*,
“but there are some red lines. Elon has a lot of business in China and he has good relations there, and this briefing just wasn’t the right thing.”
A Public Denial — And a Private Reversal
After the leak triggered headlines, Trump quickly posted a denial on Truth Social, calling the story “completely untrue.”
“They said, incorrectly, that Elon Musk is going to the Pentagon tomorrow to be briefed on any potential ‘war with China.’ How ridiculous? … The story is completely untrue!!!”
But according to Axios, Trump had already canceled the meeting by the time that post went live.
Musk still visited the Pentagon the next day, but the original China-focused content was scrubbed from the agenda. Instead, sources say, the conversation was significantly dialed back, avoiding any discussion of war planning with Beijing.
Musk Responds with Fury
Musk fired back on X (formerly Twitter), slamming the leak and taking direct aim at Pentagon insiders.
“I look forward to the prosecutions of those at the Pentagon who are leaking maliciously false information to NYT. They will be found.”
His post quickly stirred controversy, especially as fallout inside the Defense Department was swift. According to Reuters and Politico, Defense Secretary Hegseth suspended two officials — Dan Caldwell and Darin Selnick — as part of the ongoing leak investigation. Selnick, in particular, was reportedly escorted from the building.
And this leak isn’t an isolated case. The same probe is reportedly examining separate disclosures regarding U.S. operations in the Panama Canal, the Red Sea, and Ukraine intelligence activities.
Tensions Between Allies?
This latest drama underscores the complex, sometimes volatile dynamic between Trump and Musk. While the two men have publicly praised each other, this incident reveals clear limits — especially when it comes to classified military strategy.
For now, it appears Musk is back in the good graces of some inside the administration, but the trust gap has widened. And Trump’s reported fury suggests that, despite personal admiration, the national security line isn’t one he’s willing to let Musk cross.
With multiple investigations underway and major geopolitical issues at stake, the political and defense fallout from this failed briefing could continue to ripple well beyond the walls of the Pentagon.
A public revelation involving one of the world’s most polarizing figures has sparked intense scrutiny, conversation, and speculation. Ashley St. Clair, a conservative commentator and former contributor for “The Babylon Bee,” has disclosed that she shares a child with Elon Musk. The child, named Romulus, was born five months ago and had remained out of public view until now.
The baby’s name, reminiscent of ancient Rome, quickly ignited debate online after St. Clair’s quiet confirmation earlier this year. Some social media users were quick to criticize the choice, though others compared it favorably to Musk’s previous unconventional naming choices. Remarks ranged from expressions of sympathy for the child to sarcastic jabs about Musk’s growing list of uniquely named children.
Details surrounding the relationship emerged in a report by The Wall Street Journal. According to the report, Musk had offered St. Clair a one-time payment of $15 million and a monthly support stipend of $100,000 in exchange for keeping their child and their relationship confidential. The offer came with several conditions: Musk’s name would be omitted from the birth certificate, and St. Clair would be barred from discussing him publicly or connecting him to their child. Violating the terms would require returning the lump sum.
St. Clair initially complied with some requests but ultimately refused to sign the full agreement. Her concerns centered on the long-term implications for her son, especially the potential stigma of secrecy. She also noted that the agreement lacked important protections for the child, including no trust fund, no provisions in case of illness, and no life insurance for Musk’s death before the child reached adulthood.
Seeking clarity and legal security, St. Clair requested a paternity test, which is standard for formal child-support cases in New York. She also attempted to speak directly with Musk, but her messages went unanswered. After discovering a tabloid was preparing to report the story, she preemptively posted on social media in February, stating, “Five months ago, I welcomed a new baby into the world. Elon Musk is the father.” She said her original decision to stay quiet was to protect her child’s safety and privacy.
Following her disclosure, Musk rescinded the $15 million offer. When legal proceedings began—including a request for a gag order—her support payments were slashed. By April 10, when The Wall Street Journal reached out to Musk for comment, the scheduled monthly payment had not been delivered. Later that day, she received a partial payment of $20,000—half of the new agreed amount.
Jared Birchall, Musk’s financial adviser and a key figure in the negotiations, allegedly told St. Clair that similar non-disclosure arrangements existed with other mothers of Musk’s children. He also reportedly urged her to finalize the agreement after Romulus was born.
Musk’s drive to expand his family is part of a broader, self-proclaimed mission to counter global population decline. He has openly shared his belief that humanity’s long-term survival depends on becoming a multiplanetary species and increasing the number of intelligent individuals on Earth. According to texts reviewed by the Journal, Musk referred to his offspring as a “legion,” citing Roman military terminology and suggesting they use surrogates to grow it further.
He also expressed fears that revealing his connection to St. Clair and the child could put him at risk, claiming in a text that he considered himself “#2 after Trump for assassination” and adding, “only the paranoid survive.”
The story inevitably brings comparisons to Musk’s high-profile relationship with musician Grimes, with whom he shares multiple children. Their first child’s name—X Æ A-12—sparked global curiosity in 2020, prompting Grimes to post an explanation of the symbols and meanings. She described the name as a combination of scientific references and personal significance.
Later, in a Vanity Fair interview, Grimes revealed they had welcomed a second child via surrogate, known publicly as Y. She acknowledged the challenges of being linked so publicly to Musk and described their relationship as fluid. Though no longer traditionally together, the pair remained close and co-parented while maintaining separate homes.
Grimes described Musk as deeply involved with their son X, viewing him as a protégé and involving him in public appearances and major events. She also shared intimate details about her first pregnancy, noting serious complications and the physical toll it took on her.
Through it all, Musk’s approach to parenthood has remained as unconventional as his business ventures. His personal life—now dotted with children born across different relationships—continues to draw public attention and scrutiny, often revealing the complex interplay between ambition, privacy, and legacy.
With Ashley St. Clair’s public statement and legal proceedings now underway, questions remain about the future arrangement for Romulus and what it may mean for Musk’s growing family—and for those navigating its ripple effects.
The baby’s name, reminiscent of ancient Rome, quickly ignited debate online after St. Clair’s quiet confirmation earlier this year. Some social media users were quick to criticize the choice, though others compared it favorably to Musk’s previous unconventional naming choices. Remarks ranged from expressions of sympathy for the child to sarcastic jabs about Musk’s growing list of uniquely named children.
Details surrounding the relationship emerged in a report by The Wall Street Journal. According to the report, Musk had offered St. Clair a one-time payment of $15 million and a monthly support stipend of $100,000 in exchange for keeping their child and their relationship confidential. The offer came with several conditions: Musk’s name would be omitted from the birth certificate, and St. Clair would be barred from discussing him publicly or connecting him to their child. Violating the terms would require returning the lump sum.
St. Clair initially complied with some requests but ultimately refused to sign the full agreement. Her concerns centered on the long-term implications for her son, especially the potential stigma of secrecy. She also noted that the agreement lacked important protections for the child, including no trust fund, no provisions in case of illness, and no life insurance for Musk’s death before the child reached adulthood.
Seeking clarity and legal security, St. Clair requested a paternity test, which is standard for formal child-support cases in New York. She also attempted to speak directly with Musk, but her messages went unanswered. After discovering a tabloid was preparing to report the story, she preemptively posted on social media in February, stating, “Five months ago, I welcomed a new baby into the world. Elon Musk is the father.” She said her original decision to stay quiet was to protect her child’s safety and privacy.
Following her disclosure, Musk rescinded the $15 million offer. When legal proceedings began—including a request for a gag order—her support payments were slashed. By April 10, when The Wall Street Journal reached out to Musk for comment, the scheduled monthly payment had not been delivered. Later that day, she received a partial payment of $20,000—half of the new agreed amount.
Jared Birchall, Musk’s financial adviser and a key figure in the negotiations, allegedly told St. Clair that similar non-disclosure arrangements existed with other mothers of Musk’s children. He also reportedly urged her to finalize the agreement after Romulus was born.
Musk’s drive to expand his family is part of a broader, self-proclaimed mission to counter global population decline. He has openly shared his belief that humanity’s long-term survival depends on becoming a multiplanetary species and increasing the number of intelligent individuals on Earth. According to texts reviewed by the Journal, Musk referred to his offspring as a “legion,” citing Roman military terminology and suggesting they use surrogates to grow it further.
He also expressed fears that revealing his connection to St. Clair and the child could put him at risk, claiming in a text that he considered himself “#2 after Trump for assassination” and adding, “only the paranoid survive.”
The story inevitably brings comparisons to Musk’s high-profile relationship with musician Grimes, with whom he shares multiple children. Their first child’s name—X Æ A-12—sparked global curiosity in 2020, prompting Grimes to post an explanation of the symbols and meanings. She described the name as a combination of scientific references and personal significance.
Later, in a Vanity Fair interview, Grimes revealed they had welcomed a second child via surrogate, known publicly as Y. She acknowledged the challenges of being linked so publicly to Musk and described their relationship as fluid. Though no longer traditionally together, the pair remained close and co-parented while maintaining separate homes.
Grimes described Musk as deeply involved with their son X, viewing him as a protégé and involving him in public appearances and major events. She also shared intimate details about her first pregnancy, noting serious complications and the physical toll it took on her.
Through it all, Musk’s approach to parenthood has remained as unconventional as his business ventures. His personal life—now dotted with children born across different relationships—continues to draw public attention and scrutiny, often revealing the complex interplay between ambition, privacy, and legacy.
With Ashley St. Clair’s public statement and legal proceedings now underway, questions remain about the future arrangement for Romulus and what it may mean for Musk’s growing family—and for those navigating its ripple effects.
In a dramatic and unexpected twist on The View, Fox News contributor Tyrus delivered a hard-hitting critique that left the show’s hosts speechless and set social media ablaze. What began as a typical segment discussing race and identity turned into a full-blown confrontation, with Tyrus challenging the show’s portrayal of race issues in a way that stunned the panel and ignited a fierce online debate.
The Moment That Shook The View
During a discussion about race disparities in law enforcement, Tyrus interrupted the usual back-and-forth to call out The View’s approach to race discussions. With no hesitation, he fired back, “This isn’t a conversation anymore, it’s a cycle. A race-obsessed echo chamber. What you’re doing is not helping people—it’s dividing them.”
The room fell silent as Tyrus continued: “There are real issues out there, but every discussion doesn’t have to be filtered through a racial lens. That’s not justice. That’s not progress. That’s propaganda.”
The hosts, including the usually quick-witted Joy Behar and Whoopi Goldberg, were left scrambling, struggling to respond as the camera panned to their stunned faces. The confrontation was so intense that Behar reportedly glanced off-camera, while Goldberg tried to shift the conversation away from Tyrus’s piercing remarks.
The Backlash and Support
As expected, Tyrus’s bold words went viral almost immediately. Clips of the tense exchange were shared millions of times on social media platforms, with hashtags like #TyrusTruth, #TheViewExposed, and #RaceRhetoric trending as viewers weighed in on his unfiltered approach.
Many praised Tyrus for his honesty, with one fan tweeting, “Tyrus just body-slammed The View’s narrative in 30 seconds.” Another user added, “That was the most honest thing I’ve ever heard on that show.” Independent media figures and centrists also applauded the moment as a much-needed shift in how mainstream media handles discussions about race.
However, the praise wasn’t universal. Critics quickly labeled Tyrus’s remarks as dismissive, accusing him of minimizing the challenges faced by marginalized communities. Progressive commentators called his statements “overly simplistic” and “dangerously reductive.”
Still, even some of The View’s viewers, who typically lean center-left, admitted that the show’s failure to adequately respond to Tyrus’s critique left them uncomfortable. The awkwardness of the moment was palpable, with many pointing out the lack of effective rebuttals from the hosts.
Tyrus’s rhetorical style was blunt and unapologetically direct, appealing to an audience frustrated with the politicization of race. His refusal to engage in the usual political correctness and his focus on calling out media hypocrisy resonated deeply with viewers who have become disillusioned with what they see as mainstream media’s tendency to pander to one narrative.
“What you’re doing is not helping people,” Tyrus said, cutting through the typical discourse of racial justice. By delivering his critique on The View—one of the most-watched progressive-leaning talk shows—he challenged the very foundation of their race-related discussions. His words hit hard, forcing a reckoning in real-time about the way race is discussed in America’s media landscape.
A National Conversation About Media and Race
Tyrus’s confrontation has sparked a broader conversation about media accountability and the balance between advocacy and objectivity. His comments have reignited debates about whether shows like The View are truly platforms for open dialogue or if they are more concerned with pushing a particular ideological agenda. Tyrus’s critique has emboldened other commentators, particularly from conservative and libertarian circles, to speak out against what they see as media hypocrisy and double standards.
For many, Tyrus’s appearance was a wake-up call—an example of someone calling out the media’s tendency to politicize race rather than addressing it with nuance and clarity. It raised important questions about whether TV networks are using the race narrative for ratings or genuinely seeking to foster understanding and unity.
Will This Change The Tone of The View?
Inside sources from the The View set have revealed that the moment left a lasting impact. “No one expected that level of pushback, especially not that eloquently and forcefully delivered. Tyrus flipped the script,” said an anonymous show insider. “Whether they agree or not, everyone in the room felt it.”
There are rumors that producers may hesitate to invite Tyrus back, fearing that future confrontations could derail the show’s carefully cultivated tone. However, some behind-the-scenes are arguing that Tyrus’s segment might actually bring much-needed authenticity to a show often criticized for being overly scripted and predictable.
Conclusion: A Flashpoint for Media Change?
Whether you agreed with Tyrus’s remarks or found them uncomfortable, one thing is clear: he broke through the veneer of politically correct discourse that often dominates mainstream media. This confrontation isn’t just about a single TV segment—it’s a turning point in the national conversation about race, media integrity, and the limits of politically acceptable discourse.
As the dust settles, The View and other media outlets will have to reflect on how they address issues of race, and whether they are truly fostering honest dialogue or merely performing for an audience.
Tyrus’s bold challenge on The View has left a lasting impression, and only time will tell if it will spark a shift in the way race and identity are discussed on mainstream TV.
The Moment That Shook The View
During a discussion about race disparities in law enforcement, Tyrus interrupted the usual back-and-forth to call out The View’s approach to race discussions. With no hesitation, he fired back, “This isn’t a conversation anymore, it’s a cycle. A race-obsessed echo chamber. What you’re doing is not helping people—it’s dividing them.”
The room fell silent as Tyrus continued: “There are real issues out there, but every discussion doesn’t have to be filtered through a racial lens. That’s not justice. That’s not progress. That’s propaganda.”
The hosts, including the usually quick-witted Joy Behar and Whoopi Goldberg, were left scrambling, struggling to respond as the camera panned to their stunned faces. The confrontation was so intense that Behar reportedly glanced off-camera, while Goldberg tried to shift the conversation away from Tyrus’s piercing remarks.
The Backlash and Support
As expected, Tyrus’s bold words went viral almost immediately. Clips of the tense exchange were shared millions of times on social media platforms, with hashtags like #TyrusTruth, #TheViewExposed, and #RaceRhetoric trending as viewers weighed in on his unfiltered approach.
Many praised Tyrus for his honesty, with one fan tweeting, “Tyrus just body-slammed The View’s narrative in 30 seconds.” Another user added, “That was the most honest thing I’ve ever heard on that show.” Independent media figures and centrists also applauded the moment as a much-needed shift in how mainstream media handles discussions about race.
However, the praise wasn’t universal. Critics quickly labeled Tyrus’s remarks as dismissive, accusing him of minimizing the challenges faced by marginalized communities. Progressive commentators called his statements “overly simplistic” and “dangerously reductive.”
Still, even some of The View’s viewers, who typically lean center-left, admitted that the show’s failure to adequately respond to Tyrus’s critique left them uncomfortable. The awkwardness of the moment was palpable, with many pointing out the lack of effective rebuttals from the hosts.
Tyrus’s rhetorical style was blunt and unapologetically direct, appealing to an audience frustrated with the politicization of race. His refusal to engage in the usual political correctness and his focus on calling out media hypocrisy resonated deeply with viewers who have become disillusioned with what they see as mainstream media’s tendency to pander to one narrative.
“What you’re doing is not helping people,” Tyrus said, cutting through the typical discourse of racial justice. By delivering his critique on The View—one of the most-watched progressive-leaning talk shows—he challenged the very foundation of their race-related discussions. His words hit hard, forcing a reckoning in real-time about the way race is discussed in America’s media landscape.
A National Conversation About Media and Race
Tyrus’s confrontation has sparked a broader conversation about media accountability and the balance between advocacy and objectivity. His comments have reignited debates about whether shows like The View are truly platforms for open dialogue or if they are more concerned with pushing a particular ideological agenda. Tyrus’s critique has emboldened other commentators, particularly from conservative and libertarian circles, to speak out against what they see as media hypocrisy and double standards.
For many, Tyrus’s appearance was a wake-up call—an example of someone calling out the media’s tendency to politicize race rather than addressing it with nuance and clarity. It raised important questions about whether TV networks are using the race narrative for ratings or genuinely seeking to foster understanding and unity.
Will This Change The Tone of The View?
Inside sources from the The View set have revealed that the moment left a lasting impact. “No one expected that level of pushback, especially not that eloquently and forcefully delivered. Tyrus flipped the script,” said an anonymous show insider. “Whether they agree or not, everyone in the room felt it.”
There are rumors that producers may hesitate to invite Tyrus back, fearing that future confrontations could derail the show’s carefully cultivated tone. However, some behind-the-scenes are arguing that Tyrus’s segment might actually bring much-needed authenticity to a show often criticized for being overly scripted and predictable.
Conclusion: A Flashpoint for Media Change?
Whether you agreed with Tyrus’s remarks or found them uncomfortable, one thing is clear: he broke through the veneer of politically correct discourse that often dominates mainstream media. This confrontation isn’t just about a single TV segment—it’s a turning point in the national conversation about race, media integrity, and the limits of politically acceptable discourse.
As the dust settles, The View and other media outlets will have to reflect on how they address issues of race, and whether they are truly fostering honest dialogue or merely performing for an audience.
Tyrus’s bold challenge on The View has left a lasting impression, and only time will tell if it will spark a shift in the way race and identity are discussed on mainstream TV.
Does Your Thumb Reveal Your Future? This Viral Hand Chart Thinks So
In the ever-fascinating world of palmistry and body symbolism, a new viral image is making waves online—suggesting that your thumb’s lines could indicate whether you’re destined to be poor, rich, or even a genius.
The chart, originally shared by the account @condsty, shows three variations of a thumb with markings that resemble the letter “Y” inside the thumbprint area. Depending on the position and formation of this “Y,” the thumb is categorized into one of three fates:
Poor: The “Y” lines sit in a lower and unbalanced position.
Rich: The lines are slightly higher and form a more symmetrical “Y”.
Genius: The “Y” is even more centered, with a wider and stronger alignment.
While the science behind this is non-existent—this chart is clearly meant to be fun—it taps into the timeless idea that our destiny is hidden in the lines of our hands.
Why This Went Viral
The reason people love this so much? It’s easy to relate to, sparks curiosity, and gives everyone something to talk about. Much like astrology or personality tests, this is a form of modern-day mythos that mixes a bit of fun with a touch of introspection.
Psychology Behind It
Even if there’s no factual correlation between thumb lines and your net worth, there’s psychology at play. When people see themselves in a certain category (especially one labeled genius or rich), it may even reinforce a positive self-image. That’s the power of suggestion!
Try It Yourself!
Look at your thumb.
Check for the “Y” pattern.
Compare it to the chart.
Share this with friends and see what they get!
In the ever-fascinating world of palmistry and body symbolism, a new viral image is making waves online—suggesting that your thumb’s lines could indicate whether you’re destined to be poor, rich, or even a genius.
The chart, originally shared by the account @condsty, shows three variations of a thumb with markings that resemble the letter “Y” inside the thumbprint area. Depending on the position and formation of this “Y,” the thumb is categorized into one of three fates:
Poor: The “Y” lines sit in a lower and unbalanced position.
Rich: The lines are slightly higher and form a more symmetrical “Y”.
Genius: The “Y” is even more centered, with a wider and stronger alignment.
While the science behind this is non-existent—this chart is clearly meant to be fun—it taps into the timeless idea that our destiny is hidden in the lines of our hands.
Why This Went Viral
The reason people love this so much? It’s easy to relate to, sparks curiosity, and gives everyone something to talk about. Much like astrology or personality tests, this is a form of modern-day mythos that mixes a bit of fun with a touch of introspection.
Psychology Behind It
Even if there’s no factual correlation between thumb lines and your net worth, there’s psychology at play. When people see themselves in a certain category (especially one labeled genius or rich), it may even reinforce a positive self-image. That’s the power of suggestion!
Try It Yourself!
Look at your thumb.
Check for the “Y” pattern.
Compare it to the chart.
Share this with friends and see what they get!
During a recent speech in Chicago, Joe Biden made a surprising move that defied an unwritten rule in American politics: he publicly criticized the current administration.
Donald Trump was not going to overlook that, as was to be expected.
An uncommon move
At the Advocates, Counselors, and Representatives for the Disabled conference in Chicago on Tuesday, Joe Biden gave his first speech in public since leaving the White House. Many had been waiting for Biden’s response to Donald Trump’s constant attacks, so it was a much-anticipated moment.
From rising food prices and inflation to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, Trump has made it a daily habit to accuse Biden of being to blame. During his press conferences, he frequently refers to Biden as “the worst president the U.S. has ever had.” Biden’s decision to retaliate was therefore inevitable.
Biden publicly criticized Trump’s management of Social Security, a rare move that broke the unwritten rule of silence among former presidents.
They proposed allowing social security to expire every five years unless Congress reauthorized it. Who on earth do they believe they are?
Additionally, he criticized his predecessor for raising the debt ceiling after granting the ultra-wealthy what Biden referred to as a “profligate tax” cut.
“This guy raised the debt ceiling the last time he was in office because of a huge and wasteful tax on the extremely wealthy.”
Fiery reaction
It should come as no surprise that Donald Trump responded to Joe Biden’s remarks right away. In keeping with his straightforward demeanor, he responded promptly.
Donald Trump attacked his political opponents once more in a scathing post that was shared on Truth Social this morning (April 16). He did not hold back in his criticism of Joe Biden. Declaring “Sleepy Joe Biden” to be “THE WORST PRESIDENT IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES,” Trump didn’t mince words.
Trump’s remarks were a continuation of his campaign against illegal immigration and crime. He specifically blasted Biden’s approach to border security, saying that the “dangerous and ill-conceived Open Border” policy was the reason why “millions and millions of criminals”—including murderers, drug dealers, and those released from prisons and mental institutions—flocked into the United States.
“I’m sorry, but it’s my job to get these killers and thugs out of here,” Trump added further. I was elected to do just that. MAGA!
Gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAAAAACH5BAEKAAEALAAAAAABAAEAAAICTAEAOw==
Getty Pictures
In keeping with his crackdown on crime, Trump also hinted in his post that he may deport Americans convicted of violent crimes if a legal route could be found.
Trump, however, didn’t stop there. In a different post, he addressed former President Barack Obama’s criticism of Trump’s decision to stop giving Harvard $2.3 billion in funding. “Harvard has been hiring almost all woke, Radical Left, idiots and ‘birdbrains’ who are only capable of teaching FAILURE to students and so-called ‘future leaders,'” Trump said in his criticism of the university.
“Harvard should no longer receive federal funds because it is a joke that spreads ignorance and hatred. I appreciate you taking the time to look into this. Trump went on.
It is evident that the verbal sparring between these leaders is not going to stop anytime soon as their political battle heats up. Do you think Biden will reply to Trump once more?
Donald Trump was not going to overlook that, as was to be expected.
An uncommon move
At the Advocates, Counselors, and Representatives for the Disabled conference in Chicago on Tuesday, Joe Biden gave his first speech in public since leaving the White House. Many had been waiting for Biden’s response to Donald Trump’s constant attacks, so it was a much-anticipated moment.
From rising food prices and inflation to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, Trump has made it a daily habit to accuse Biden of being to blame. During his press conferences, he frequently refers to Biden as “the worst president the U.S. has ever had.” Biden’s decision to retaliate was therefore inevitable.
Biden publicly criticized Trump’s management of Social Security, a rare move that broke the unwritten rule of silence among former presidents.
They proposed allowing social security to expire every five years unless Congress reauthorized it. Who on earth do they believe they are?
Additionally, he criticized his predecessor for raising the debt ceiling after granting the ultra-wealthy what Biden referred to as a “profligate tax” cut.
“This guy raised the debt ceiling the last time he was in office because of a huge and wasteful tax on the extremely wealthy.”
Fiery reaction
It should come as no surprise that Donald Trump responded to Joe Biden’s remarks right away. In keeping with his straightforward demeanor, he responded promptly.
Donald Trump attacked his political opponents once more in a scathing post that was shared on Truth Social this morning (April 16). He did not hold back in his criticism of Joe Biden. Declaring “Sleepy Joe Biden” to be “THE WORST PRESIDENT IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES,” Trump didn’t mince words.
Trump’s remarks were a continuation of his campaign against illegal immigration and crime. He specifically blasted Biden’s approach to border security, saying that the “dangerous and ill-conceived Open Border” policy was the reason why “millions and millions of criminals”—including murderers, drug dealers, and those released from prisons and mental institutions—flocked into the United States.
“I’m sorry, but it’s my job to get these killers and thugs out of here,” Trump added further. I was elected to do just that. MAGA!
Gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAAAAACH5BAEKAAEALAAAAAABAAEAAAICTAEAOw==
Getty Pictures
In keeping with his crackdown on crime, Trump also hinted in his post that he may deport Americans convicted of violent crimes if a legal route could be found.
Trump, however, didn’t stop there. In a different post, he addressed former President Barack Obama’s criticism of Trump’s decision to stop giving Harvard $2.3 billion in funding. “Harvard has been hiring almost all woke, Radical Left, idiots and ‘birdbrains’ who are only capable of teaching FAILURE to students and so-called ‘future leaders,'” Trump said in his criticism of the university.
“Harvard should no longer receive federal funds because it is a joke that spreads ignorance and hatred. I appreciate you taking the time to look into this. Trump went on.
It is evident that the verbal sparring between these leaders is not going to stop anytime soon as their political battle heats up. Do you think Biden will reply to Trump once more?
Here’s how to pick a perfectly ripe watermelon:
1.*Check the Sugar Spot* – A small, dry, slightly sunken sugar spot indicates ripeness. Avoid large or moist spots.
2.*Look for Uniform Color* – A deep green rind with consistent coloring is best.
3.*Feel the Weight* – A ripe watermelon should feel heavy for its size.
4.*Tap for a Hollow Sound* – A deep, hollow sound signals ripeness, while a dull sound suggests it’s underripe.
5.*Check the Field Spot* – A yellowish spot means it’s ripe; white or green indicates it’s not ready.
6.*Inspect the Rind* – A smooth, unblemished rind suggests freshness, while deep cuts or soft spots may indicate spoilage. Use these tips to enjoy a sweet, juicy watermelon every time!
1.*Check the Sugar Spot* – A small, dry, slightly sunken sugar spot indicates ripeness. Avoid large or moist spots.
2.*Look for Uniform Color* – A deep green rind with consistent coloring is best.
3.*Feel the Weight* – A ripe watermelon should feel heavy for its size.
4.*Tap for a Hollow Sound* – A deep, hollow sound signals ripeness, while a dull sound suggests it’s underripe.
5.*Check the Field Spot* – A yellowish spot means it’s ripe; white or green indicates it’s not ready.
6.*Inspect the Rind* – A smooth, unblemished rind suggests freshness, while deep cuts or soft spots may indicate spoilage. Use these tips to enjoy a sweet, juicy watermelon every time!