Top Video Viral
One tiny garment managed to ignite outrage, provoke bans, and even lead to arrests around the world. In the long-standing tug-of-war between modesty and freedom, the bikini emerged as both a villain and a symbol of liberation. Popes condemned it as sinful, governments outlawed it, and yet women, determined to claim their space, kept wearing it—reshaping cultural expectations one bold appearance at a time.
At the dawn of the 20th century, swimsuits were a far cry from the sleek designs we know today. They were heavy, full-body garments made from wool, built not for fashion, but to uphold modesty and shield swimmers from the sun. Strict dress codes governed public beaches across the United States. In Chicago’s Clarendon Beach, tailors were stationed on-site to quickly sew up swimsuits deemed too revealing. In Coney Island, bathing socks were banned in 1915 if they exposed a woman’s “dimpled knees.” Washington, D.C.’s beach police famously patrolled with tape measures to ensure swimsuits met the mandated standards.
The early 1900s demanded full coverage, with swimsuits extending from neck to knee. Exposing any additional skin risked being labeled scandalous. But the tides of change were inevitable. In 1907, Australian swimmer Annette Kellerman dared to challenge the norms by donning a one-piece suit that revealed her arms, legs, and neck—eschewing the bulky pantaloons of the day. Known as “the Australian Mermaid,” Kellerman’s revolutionary swimwear reportedly led to her arrest, though official records are scarce. Still, the moment made headlines and helped spark a swimwear revolution. Her one-piece design gained immense popularity, culminating in her own line of swimwear, the “Annette Kellermans,” marking the first significant step toward modern women’s swimwear.
As the 1920s roared on, societal shifts accelerated. The era’s flapper culture began influencing beachwear too. In California, a group dubbed the “skirts be hanged girls” rebelled against traditional expectations by advocating for practical, form-fitting swimsuits that allowed freedom of movement. Swimsuits slowly grew more liberating, even though they remained relatively modest by today’s standards. Fashion was changing—but the true upheaval was still to come.
In 1946, the bikini burst onto the scene. French engineer Louis Réard introduced the now-iconic two-piece swimsuit that revealed the navel and far more skin than anyone had dared before. The timing was provocative; just days earlier, the U.S. had conducted a nuclear test at Bikini Atoll. Whether coincidental or deliberate, the choice of name suggested the swimsuit’s explosive impact. Public reaction was fierce. Bikinis were banned from many beaches, both in the U.S. and abroad. France outlawed them in 1949, and German public pools banned them until the 1970s. Communist groups slammed the bikini as a symbol of capitalist immorality. Pope Pius XII declared it sinful, and countries like Belgium, Italy, Portugal, and Spain imposed nationwide bans. In 1952, Australian model Ann Ferguson was famously asked to leave Surfers Paradise beach for wearing a bikini deemed too revealing.
One iconic photo captured the era’s tension: a man in uniform standing beside a young woman in a bikini on an Italian beach, allegedly ticketing her for indecency. While the photo itself is authentic, the full story behind it remains unclear. Gianluca Braschi, director of the State Archives of Rimini, confirmed that indecent swimwear laws were in place in Italy at the time, though enforcement varied widely. The viral image, regardless of its specifics, embodies the real cultural battles over public decency and women’s freedom.
It wasn’t until the 1960s that bikinis started gaining mainstream acceptance. Cultural shifts in fashion, feminism, and film opened the door for bolder swimwear styles. Yet, resistance persisted. Hollywood’s Hays Code forbade navel exposure in films, and watchdog groups like the National Legion of Decency pressured filmmakers to keep bikinis off the big screen. Despite these barriers, stars like Marilyn Monroe, Ursula Andress, and Brigitte Bardot broke through.
Bardot’s starring role in The Girl in the Bikini turned the swimsuit into a cinematic symbol of freedom and sensuality. Her relaxed, effortless glamour redefined public perceptions, blending beauty and boldness. Ursula Andress further cemented the bikini’s status in 1962’s Dr. No, when she strode out of the ocean in a white bikini with a knife at her hip, projecting strength as much as sex appeal.
By the 1970s, the bikini was no longer an act of rebellion; it was mainstream. Swimsuits became even more daring, with string bikinis and thong styles emerging. Men’s swimwear also shifted toward minimalism. The modesty that had defined the early 20th century faded, replaced by an era of personal expression.
Today, swimwear reflects an entirely new ethos—one built on diversity, choice, and body positivity. The conversation is no longer about how much skin a swimsuit covers, but about how it empowers the individual wearing it. Whether it’s a full-coverage one-piece or a daring thong bikini, the focus is on comfort, confidence, and freedom.
What began as a battle over modesty has transformed into a celebration of individuality. The next time you slip into a swimsuit, remember: it’s more than fabric—it’s a symbol of how far society has come in honoring personal expression and the right to be seen, just as you are.
Would you like a slightly more formal or SEO-optimized version as well?
At the dawn of the 20th century, swimsuits were a far cry from the sleek designs we know today. They were heavy, full-body garments made from wool, built not for fashion, but to uphold modesty and shield swimmers from the sun. Strict dress codes governed public beaches across the United States. In Chicago’s Clarendon Beach, tailors were stationed on-site to quickly sew up swimsuits deemed too revealing. In Coney Island, bathing socks were banned in 1915 if they exposed a woman’s “dimpled knees.” Washington, D.C.’s beach police famously patrolled with tape measures to ensure swimsuits met the mandated standards.
The early 1900s demanded full coverage, with swimsuits extending from neck to knee. Exposing any additional skin risked being labeled scandalous. But the tides of change were inevitable. In 1907, Australian swimmer Annette Kellerman dared to challenge the norms by donning a one-piece suit that revealed her arms, legs, and neck—eschewing the bulky pantaloons of the day. Known as “the Australian Mermaid,” Kellerman’s revolutionary swimwear reportedly led to her arrest, though official records are scarce. Still, the moment made headlines and helped spark a swimwear revolution. Her one-piece design gained immense popularity, culminating in her own line of swimwear, the “Annette Kellermans,” marking the first significant step toward modern women’s swimwear.
As the 1920s roared on, societal shifts accelerated. The era’s flapper culture began influencing beachwear too. In California, a group dubbed the “skirts be hanged girls” rebelled against traditional expectations by advocating for practical, form-fitting swimsuits that allowed freedom of movement. Swimsuits slowly grew more liberating, even though they remained relatively modest by today’s standards. Fashion was changing—but the true upheaval was still to come.
In 1946, the bikini burst onto the scene. French engineer Louis Réard introduced the now-iconic two-piece swimsuit that revealed the navel and far more skin than anyone had dared before. The timing was provocative; just days earlier, the U.S. had conducted a nuclear test at Bikini Atoll. Whether coincidental or deliberate, the choice of name suggested the swimsuit’s explosive impact. Public reaction was fierce. Bikinis were banned from many beaches, both in the U.S. and abroad. France outlawed them in 1949, and German public pools banned them until the 1970s. Communist groups slammed the bikini as a symbol of capitalist immorality. Pope Pius XII declared it sinful, and countries like Belgium, Italy, Portugal, and Spain imposed nationwide bans. In 1952, Australian model Ann Ferguson was famously asked to leave Surfers Paradise beach for wearing a bikini deemed too revealing.
One iconic photo captured the era’s tension: a man in uniform standing beside a young woman in a bikini on an Italian beach, allegedly ticketing her for indecency. While the photo itself is authentic, the full story behind it remains unclear. Gianluca Braschi, director of the State Archives of Rimini, confirmed that indecent swimwear laws were in place in Italy at the time, though enforcement varied widely. The viral image, regardless of its specifics, embodies the real cultural battles over public decency and women’s freedom.
It wasn’t until the 1960s that bikinis started gaining mainstream acceptance. Cultural shifts in fashion, feminism, and film opened the door for bolder swimwear styles. Yet, resistance persisted. Hollywood’s Hays Code forbade navel exposure in films, and watchdog groups like the National Legion of Decency pressured filmmakers to keep bikinis off the big screen. Despite these barriers, stars like Marilyn Monroe, Ursula Andress, and Brigitte Bardot broke through.
Bardot’s starring role in The Girl in the Bikini turned the swimsuit into a cinematic symbol of freedom and sensuality. Her relaxed, effortless glamour redefined public perceptions, blending beauty and boldness. Ursula Andress further cemented the bikini’s status in 1962’s Dr. No, when she strode out of the ocean in a white bikini with a knife at her hip, projecting strength as much as sex appeal.
By the 1970s, the bikini was no longer an act of rebellion; it was mainstream. Swimsuits became even more daring, with string bikinis and thong styles emerging. Men’s swimwear also shifted toward minimalism. The modesty that had defined the early 20th century faded, replaced by an era of personal expression.
Today, swimwear reflects an entirely new ethos—one built on diversity, choice, and body positivity. The conversation is no longer about how much skin a swimsuit covers, but about how it empowers the individual wearing it. Whether it’s a full-coverage one-piece or a daring thong bikini, the focus is on comfort, confidence, and freedom.
What began as a battle over modesty has transformed into a celebration of individuality. The next time you slip into a swimsuit, remember: it’s more than fabric—it’s a symbol of how far society has come in honoring personal expression and the right to be seen, just as you are.
Would you like a slightly more formal or SEO-optimized version as well?
A man from Katy, Texas, has been sentenced to 18 months in federal prison after being convicted of assaulting a U.S. Border Patrol agent. According to court documents, 26‑year‑old Kevin Dominguez drove his sedan to a Border Patrol checkpoint on U.S. Highway 57 on August 1, 2023.
During his approach, a trained USBP canine alerted agents to movement in his trunk, where an individual was discovered. Instead of stopping, Dominguez reversed and struck an agent with his vehicle before fleeing the scene.
During his approach, a trained USBP canine alerted agents to movement in his trunk, where an individual was discovered. Instead of stopping, Dominguez reversed and struck an agent with his vehicle before fleeing the scene.
In today’s world, there is no shortage of myths and misconceptions about the human body, especially regarding how certain physical features may correlate with aspects of a person’s health. One common belief is that certain body characteristics, like breast size, can indicate hidden physiological traits such as fertility, health. But how much truth is there to these assumptions? In this article, we’ll explore the science behind these myths and debunk the misconceptions surrounding body features and health.
Do Larger Breasts Indicate Anything About a Woman’s Health?
One of the most prevalent myths is that women with larger breasts may have higher estrogen levels, which some believe suggests better fertility and reproductive health. While it’s true that breast development is influenced by hormones like estrogen, breast size itself does not correlate with a woman’s ability to conceive or her overall health.
Breast size is determined by several factors, including:
.Genetics: A woman’s breast size is largely inherited from her family.
.Hormones: Estrogen and progesterone influence breast development during puberty and pregnancy.
.Body Fat: Since breasts are composed mostly of fatty tissue, fluctuations in body weight can affect their size.
.Lifestyle and Nutrition: A balanced diet and good overall health can influence breast size, but this doesn’t have a direct connection to reproductive health.
Does Breast Size Affect Fertility?
The idea that larger breasts are linked to higher fertility is a misconception. Fertility is determined by a broader range of factors, including hormonal balance, overall reproductive health, and lifestyle choices. Aspects such as:
.Regular menstrual cycles
.Reproductive organ health
.Diet and exercise
.Stress management
These factors are more closely related to fertility than breast size. Studies show that while cultural biases may exist, the link between breast size and fertility is psychological rather than biological. There is no scientific evidence to support the claim that larger breasts indicate better fertility.
What About Vaginal Health?
Another myth that persists is the idea that breast size is linked to vaginal health, including factors like tightness or elasticity. In reality, vaginal health is influenced by factors such as genetics, muscle tone, childbirth, and hormonal balance—none of which are determined by breast size.
The health of the vaginal area depends on things like:
.Hygiene
.Hormonal balance
.Hydration
.Lifestyle choices
Why Do These Myths Persist?
There are several reasons why these myths continue to be widespread:
1.Cultural Influence: Many societies have historically linked physical traits with fertility, personality. These associations, while long-held, are not rooted in scientific evidence.
2.Media and Misinformation: Movies, social media, and casual conversations often perpetuate stereotypes and misinformation. These myths are shared and reinforced through these platforms, leading to widespread belief.
3.Psychological Perception: Society tends to associate physical attractiveness with other desirable traits. This psychological bias can lead people to believe that certain body features have more significance than they actually do.
4.Lack of Education: A lack of comprehensive education on human biology contributes to the persistence of these myths. Without a solid understanding of the body, many people rely on misinformation.
What Really Matters for Women’s Health?
Rather than focusing on myths and physical characteristics, women should prioritize factors that have a proven impact on their health. Here are some of the most important aspects to focus on:
.Balanced Diet: Proper nutrition supports hormonal balance, reproductive health, and overall wellness. Eating a variety of fruits, vegetables, and proteins is crucial for maintaining good health.
.Regular Exercise: Physical activity helps maintain cardiovascular health, boosts mood, and supports reproductive health by improving hormonal regulation.
.Routine Check-ups: Regular visits to healthcare providers for screenings like pap smears and breast exams are essential for early detection of health issues.
.Mental and Emotional Health: Managing stress and supporting mental well-being are essential for maintaining overall health. Stress management techniques like meditation, therapy, and self-care practices are important for maintaining a balanced life.
Conclusion: Focus on Science, Not Myths
There is no scientific evidence that supports the idea that breast size correlates with fertility, health, or any other hidden aspect of a woman’s health. Women’s health is complex, and various factors—including genetics, hormones, lifestyle, and emotional well-being—contribute to overall well-being.
Instead of perpetuating myths, we should focus on science-based, evidence-backed knowledge. By prioritizing a healthy lifestyle, supporting mental health, and promoting body positivity, we can foster better well-being for women of all body types. It is important to recognize that every woman’s body is unique, and health is not determined by any single physical feature.
Reliable Sources for Further Reading:
.Mayo Clinic – Healthy Lifestyle: Comprehensive information on nutrition, exercise, and overall health. (Mayo Clinic)
.The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG): Guidance on fertility, reproductive health, and regular screenings. (ACOG)
.National Institute of Health – Breast Cancer and Health: Information on breast health and understanding risk factors. (NIH)
.WebMD – Women’s Health: Covers a variety of topics from reproductive health to mental wellness. (WebMD)
By focusing on accurate, science-based information, we can move beyond myths and better understand our bodies in a healthier, more informed way.
Three weeks late into this world, Nyilah Daise Tzabari arrived with an expediated plan to make up for lost time and get things done.
Lifting her head and scooting across her cot at only three days, Nyilah, a super baby, is evolving unusually fast, leaving her first-time mom and dad in shock.
Still in the hospital, baby Nyilah was captured on camera, lifting her own head and crawling in her cot.
She was less than three days old.
“The video was taken when Nyilah wasn’t even a full three days old. She was two and a half days old,” said first-time mom, Samantha Mitchell, of White Oak, PA, who added her wonder baby makes her feel like “she’s never had a newborn.”
Speaking with Kennedy News (though New York Post), the 34-year-old mom said, “I’ve babysat most of my life and have over 20 years’ experience with children and I’ve never seen anything like this before.” She continued, “I guess I’ve never been around many babies at three days old so there are a lot of (nuances) in it but I have never seen a baby like this ever.”
In the TikTok video, when Nyilah uses her tiny front arms to prop herself up and crawl, you can hear Samantha’s mom say, “no fricken way,” and Samantha, who sounds gobsmacked, saying “Oh my gosh. Mom! She’s crawling! Mom!…how does that even move?”
Responding to her baby’s cooing, Samantha says, “Well that’s what happens when you spend too much time in mommy’s belly.”
Born to parents Samantha and her fiancé Ofer Tzabari, Nyilah was three weeks late. She entered the world on February 27, 2023 at 7 lbs 6 oz and went viral when Samantha filmed her unexpected movements to prove to her family and friends that her baby was already crawling.
“My mother was the only other person in the room when it happened and she told me to record it,” Samantha said. “No one would have believed me otherwise. My fiancé wasn’t in the room, and I know if I didn’t get it on film, he would not have believed me…(The video shows) the first time I saw her crawl and I was in complete shock…The way she lifted her head too and was babbling left me in complete shock,” she added.
Fans were equally surprised about Nyilah’s incredible strength, and jumped in with comments like, “These new babies are different they come out crawling and be walking at 1 month old, talking at 3 months and getting jobs at 2yrs old.”
Another user jokes, “I would run out without the baby,” while one says, “Rumor has it she left on a plane a day later to live life.”
According to Healthline, most babies start to creep or crawl around six to 12 months. “And for many of them, the crawling stage doesn’t last long–once they get a taste of independence, they start pulling up and cruising on the way to walking.”
“Oh momma! you better get home and baby proof! that little is already on the move!!” One user wrote, cautioning Samantha on her quickly developing newborn.
“Sometimes I laugh and just think I wish she could be a baby,” Samantha said.
It seems like Nyilah is on the fast-track to growing up. At only 18 days, she was rolling from her belly to her back, at one month old, she was smiling at her mom, at two months she was rolling from her back to her belly, and at three months, she was slugging her mom with her powerful arms.
In an adorable video posted June 6, Samantha gets a mitten-covered fist to the face and giggling, she says, “Oh you punched mommy.”
In addition to testing out the strength of her arms, Nyilah is already standing with support, and mom predicts it won’t be long until she starts walking.
“Without a doubt, she will start walking soon. She stands at the moment. She puts so much weight on her legs. We’re not trying to make her stand. She just refuses to buckle her knees and sit down,” Samantha said. “She isn’t standing on her own yet, but she stands holding us and is always trying to stand.”
Also, Samantha shares that Nyilah is so strong, that she no longer needs her head and neck supported.
“I’m shocked every day by her. She tries to push herself out of her little chair and bouncer when we put her in it too…She is a very alert baby and has been since she was born. From day one her strength was very shocking to us,” the mom said.
Nyilah is turning out to be very chatty. At seven weeks, she tried to have a conversation, mimicking words spoken by her mom and dad, Ofer.
“We always say I love you to her and she seemed to be trying to repeat it to us and trying to say it. We couldn’t believe it. It is more like babbling but she is definitely trying to copy us,” Samantha said. “If she makes a noise and we laugh, she will keep making the noise because she knows we’ll react. She’s a very clever baby.”
Nyilah is also a very happy baby.
“She is such a smiley, happy baby and laughs all the time. The second you smile at her; she starts smiling and laughing back at us. She is such a happy baby and I hope her videos make everyone happy.” Tzabari added, “For me, it was the first time I’ve been with a newborn, and I thought her actions were normal until people began to tell me they weren’t…I thought this was how babies were but actually her actions aren’t average for a baby of her age.”
Niyalah is such an adorable addition to the growing family of Samantha Mitchell and Ofer Tzabari. We hope their home is well equipped to handle the quickly growing baby, who no doubt will be very curious when she starts walking. We can’t wait to see what Niyalah does next. Congratulations to the parents of the super baby!
Your kidneys play a vital role in filtering waste, balancing fluids, and keeping your body healthy.
However, kidney disease often develops silently, with symptoms appearing only in later stages. Recognizing the early warning signs can help you take action before serious complications arise.
1. Fatigue and Low Energy
When your kidneys aren’t functioning properly, toxins build up in your bloodstream, leading to persistent tiredness, weakness, and trouble concentrating. Anemia, which often accompanies kidney disease, can also leave you feeling drained.
2. Trouble Sleeping
A buildup of waste in the blood can make it difficult to fall and stay asleep. Additionally, people with kidney disease may suffer from sleep apnea, which disrupts breathing throughout the night and leads to poor rest, the National Kidney Foundation says.
3. Dry, Itchy Skin
Healthy kidneys regulate minerals and nutrients in your body. When they struggle to do their job, imbalances can cause dry, itchy skin, signaling underlying bone and mineral disorders related to kidney disease.
4. Frequent Urination
Feeling the urge to urinate more often, especially at night, can be a sign of issues. When the kidney filters are damaged, they can cause increased urine production, which may indicate early kidney disease.
5. Blood in Urine
Healthy kidneys filter waste while keeping essential blood cells in your body. If you notice blood in your urine, it could signal disease, infections, or even kidney stones. Never ignore this symptom.
6. Foamy Urine
Excessive bubbles or foam in your urine, similar to what you see when scrambling eggs, may indicate the presence of protein.
Protein leakage in urine is a sign that your kidneys aren’t filtering properly.
7. Swelling in the Feet and Ankles
When kidneys don’t remove excess sodium efficiently, fluid retention can occur, leading to swelling in your feet, ankles, and even hands. This is a common symptom of kidney disease and should be checked by a doctor.
8. Poor Appetite
A loss of appetite may seem minor, but it can be an early sign of kidney disease due to the buildup of toxins in the body. Nausea and an altered sense of taste often accompany this symptom.
9. Muscle Cramps
Electrolyte imbalances can lead to muscle cramps. Low calcium and imbalanced phosphorus levels may contribute to this uncomfortable condition.
10. Puffiness Around the Eyes
Persistent puffiness around the eyes can indicate protein leakage in urine, which suggests your kidneys may not be properly filtering waste. This can be an early sign of damage.
When to See a Doctor
If you experience any of these symptoms, especially more than one at a time, consult a healthcare professional. Early detection of problems can prevent further damage and improve your overall health.
Maintaining a balanced diet, staying hydrated, and managing conditions like high blood pressure and diabetes can help protect you in the long run.
Note: we are republishing this story which originally made the news in July 2023.
Lauren Wasser, a 35-year-old model, recently shared her near-death experience with Toxic Shock Syndrome (TSS) caused by a tampon. The terrifying ordeal left her with both legs amputated below the knee and a strong determination to raise awareness about the potential risks associated with feminine hygiene products.
Wasser recounted her harrowing journey on The Diary Of A CEO podcast with Steven Bartlett. What began as flu-like symptoms quickly escalated, resulting in a massive heart attack and life support. Gangrene took hold of both her legs, leaving no choice but to amputate them.
Now based in Los Angeles, Wasser is on a mission to alert women and young girls to the hidden dangers of tampons. She’s advocating for legislation that mandates transparency in feminine hygiene products.
In 2012, at the age of 24, Wasser turned down a full basketball scholarship to pursue her career in fashion. Little did she know that her life would take a drastic turn. As she fell ill, initially believing it was the flu, she was found unconscious and near death in her apartment, covered in feces and vomit. A wellness check by her mother had saved her life.
Her fever reached a dangerous 107 degrees, leading to a heart attack and organ failure. An infectious disease doctor suspected TSS after conducting a test. TSS is a rare and life-threatening bacterial infection often misdiagnosed due to symptoms resembling more common illnesses.
While Wasser’s life was spared, the gangrene damage to her legs was irreversible, necessitating amputation. She described the excruciating burning sensation in her feet, and the grim decision to amputate her right leg to save her life.
The revelation about her leg’s fate came unexpectedly when she overheard a nurse speaking on the phone. The trauma of the situation and the pain she endured post-amputation left her traumatized.
After being discharged from the hospital, Wasser spent eight months in a wheelchair. She wrestled with despair, thoughts of suicide, and a relentless desire to end her suffering.
Despite initially saving her left leg, Wasser faced unbearable pain over the years, ultimately leading to the difficult decision to amputate it before her 30th birthday.
In her dedication to raise awareness about TSS, Wasser highlighted concerning ingredients found in tampons, such as chlorine bleach, dioxin, and synthetic fibers. She emphasized the urgent need for better transparency in women’s menstrual products.
Wasser’s advocacy efforts include working with others who have experienced the impact of TSS, like Madeline Mosby, a mother who lost her teenage daughter to the condition. Together, they strive to pass legislation promoting transparency and safer menstrual products.
Additionally, Wasser collaborates with Democratic congresswoman Carolyn Maloney to support legislation that would require feminine hygiene product manufacturers to list all ingredients on their packaging.
Despite her challenging journey, Wasser has made a name for herself in the fashion industry, appearing in campaigns for prestigious brands like Lacoste, Furla, and Shiseido. She’s affectionately known as “fashion’s Girl with the Golden Legs” due to her golden prosthetic limbs.
Toxic shock syndrome occurs when typically harmless skin bacteria invade the bloodstream, producing dangerous toxins. Symptoms include high fever, low blood pressure, vomiting, confusion, and seizures. While rare, it primarily affects women who use tampons, emphasizing the need for awareness.
Tampon packaging already carries warnings about the deadly infection if left in for more than eight hours, but Wasser’s story underscores the importance of additional precautions and transparency.
Lauren Wasser, a 35-year-old model, recently shared her near-death experience with Toxic Shock Syndrome (TSS) caused by a tampon. The terrifying ordeal left her with both legs amputated below the knee and a strong determination to raise awareness about the potential risks associated with feminine hygiene products.
Wasser recounted her harrowing journey on The Diary Of A CEO podcast with Steven Bartlett. What began as flu-like symptoms quickly escalated, resulting in a massive heart attack and life support. Gangrene took hold of both her legs, leaving no choice but to amputate them.
Now based in Los Angeles, Wasser is on a mission to alert women and young girls to the hidden dangers of tampons. She’s advocating for legislation that mandates transparency in feminine hygiene products.
In 2012, at the age of 24, Wasser turned down a full basketball scholarship to pursue her career in fashion. Little did she know that her life would take a drastic turn. As she fell ill, initially believing it was the flu, she was found unconscious and near death in her apartment, covered in feces and vomit. A wellness check by her mother had saved her life.
Her fever reached a dangerous 107 degrees, leading to a heart attack and organ failure. An infectious disease doctor suspected TSS after conducting a test. TSS is a rare and life-threatening bacterial infection often misdiagnosed due to symptoms resembling more common illnesses.
While Wasser’s life was spared, the gangrene damage to her legs was irreversible, necessitating amputation. She described the excruciating burning sensation in her feet, and the grim decision to amputate her right leg to save her life.
The revelation about her leg’s fate came unexpectedly when she overheard a nurse speaking on the phone. The trauma of the situation and the pain she endured post-amputation left her traumatized.
After being discharged from the hospital, Wasser spent eight months in a wheelchair. She wrestled with despair, thoughts of suicide, and a relentless desire to end her suffering.
Despite initially saving her left leg, Wasser faced unbearable pain over the years, ultimately leading to the difficult decision to amputate it before her 30th birthday.
In her dedication to raise awareness about TSS, Wasser highlighted concerning ingredients found in tampons, such as chlorine bleach, dioxin, and synthetic fibers. She emphasized the urgent need for better transparency in women’s menstrual products.
Wasser’s advocacy efforts include working with others who have experienced the impact of TSS, like Madeline Mosby, a mother who lost her teenage daughter to the condition. Together, they strive to pass legislation promoting transparency and safer menstrual products.
Additionally, Wasser collaborates with Democratic congresswoman Carolyn Maloney to support legislation that would require feminine hygiene product manufacturers to list all ingredients on their packaging.
Despite her challenging journey, Wasser has made a name for herself in the fashion industry, appearing in campaigns for prestigious brands like Lacoste, Furla, and Shiseido. She’s affectionately known as “fashion’s Girl with the Golden Legs” due to her golden prosthetic limbs.
Toxic shock syndrome occurs when typically harmless skin bacteria invade the bloodstream, producing dangerous toxins. Symptoms include high fever, low blood pressure, vomiting, confusion, and seizures. While rare, it primarily affects women who use tampons, emphasizing the need for awareness.
Tampon packaging already carries warnings about the deadly infection if left in for more than eight hours, but Wasser’s story underscores the importance of additional precautions and transparency.
During a White House press conference on April 18, 2025, President Donald Trump shortened his speech after a medical incident. While swearing in Dr. Mehmet Oz as the new administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), a young girl fainted, prompting Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt to end the conference and order reporters to leave. Trump, noticing the seriousness of the situation, cut his speech short, expressing concern, “I hope she’s OK,” as Dr. Oz ran off-camera to assist.
The White House later confirmed that the fainted individual was a “minor family member” and that she was fine.
Trump introduced Dr. Oz, highlighting his credentials, including his medical education and career at institutions like Harvard and Columbia, and his role in launching The Dr. Oz Show. Despite some controversies, including criticism over his medical advice, Dr. Oz was confirmed by the Senate for the CMS position earlier that month.
The White House later confirmed that the fainted individual was a “minor family member” and that she was fine.
Trump introduced Dr. Oz, highlighting his credentials, including his medical education and career at institutions like Harvard and Columbia, and his role in launching The Dr. Oz Show. Despite some controversies, including criticism over his medical advice, Dr. Oz was confirmed by the Senate for the CMS position earlier that month.
Birthmarks can be quite special. After all, they stay throughout one’s life. And while, at times, they could look odd to others- they are special and unique. This is the story of little Winry, who was born with a birthmark that made her pretty special. She was born to Nicole Lucas Hall, who also has a son named Asher.
Winry is quite extraordinary- for her mother is a fierce warrior. After all, who would fight every day to ensure that her daughter knows she is beautiful? The 13-month-old baby was born with a mark that covers 25% of her face. Interestingly, when Winry was born, things were different. Her parents were naturally quite worried- having never seen a mark like this.
Girl With Unique Birthmark Has A Really Strong Support Behind Her
Nicole and her husband had assumed that the birthmark was something dangerous, but doctors told the parents not to worry as the mark was purely aesthetic. Winry was born with CMN or congenital melanocytic nevi. This rare condition affects only 1 in 50,000 births.
Speaking to Good Morning America, Nicole said, “When they first handed her to me, I thought it was a bruise. It was then quickly apparent to my husband and I that it was not a bruise. And like the name, I thought it looked a lot like a mole.” Being a mom in the 21st century, Nicole decided to deal with this in a different way. She utilized the power of social media to spread awareness about differences. “For a lot of people, this is the first time seeing a birthmark like hers and that’s part of why I enjoy sharing. This is a good conversation for parents with their children to see kids have differences, or for those parents who do have a kid that looks like Winry or has any kind of a birthmark to see their child represented.
Winry’s Mother Has Fully Utilized Social Media To Help Her Daughter
Although Winry’s birthmark could be a potential cause for an increase in Melanoma, her mother has other worries. “Her health and happiness are our top priority. We have to monitor her with sunscreen. I’m careful with hats and that sort of thing. I know our regular dermatology appointment is probably going to be our best friend growing up.”Speaking about Winry, Nicole mentioned, “She just radiates joy. She’s almost always laughing or shrieking. She is just the happiest baby I have ever seen. She’s a big talker already. We haven’t got a whole lot of words out, but she tells you like it is and she’s already getting a little bit of sassiness, so I think we’re gonna have a lot on our hands."
Nicole, being the ever-attentive mother, has reached far and wide to research the condition. “We’ve got to talk to several people from Brazil with birthmarks. One of them has one that is almost identical to Winry and it’s been so fun to talk to her because she’s almost exactly my age.”
Hall is pretty clear about her daughter’s birthmark. “For a lot of people, this is the first time seeing a birthmark like hers and that’s part of why I enjoy sharing. This is a good conversation for parents with their children to see kids have differences, or for those parents who do have a kid that looks like Winry or has any kind of a birthmark to see their child represented.”
Now, let’s move on to Asher, Winry’s older brother. Although not exactly an adult either, Asher is already quite taken with his sister. As Nicole reports, Asher doesn’t really think there is anything wrong with Winry. Her birthmark is just that- a birthmark. It wasn’t any different than having different eye colors. Although he can get jealous of Winry taking more of their mom’s time- this would definitely give way to love and devotion.
In a fiery press conference at the Oval Office on Thursday, President Donald Trump delivered a blistering critique aimed squarely at CNN anchor Kaitlan Collins, accusing her of bias and questioning her credibility. The confrontation, which quickly dominated headlines, saw Trump lash out at Collins and her network with unfiltered, harsh language.
The incident unfolded during a press briefing where Trump was fielding questions on the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine. While addressing a question from another reporter about whether he believed President Putin genuinely desired peace, Kaitlan Collins interrupted with her own query: “Do you trust President Putin?” This interjection set off a rapid-fire exchange that would soon escalate into a full-blown media showdown.
Trump’s response to the question about Putin was measured at first. “I believe that—yeah, I believe that he would like to see something happen. I think he would like to see something happen. I think it could have happened a long time ago,” he remarked, seemingly deflecting the inquiry. However, the tone shifted dramatically when he turned his attention to Collins. With pointed emphasis, Trump accused her of having close ties with his political rival, former President Joe Biden. “I know he [Biden] is a friend of yours,” Trump said, his voice rising as he continued his tirade.
Trump didn’t stop there. In a scathing dismissal of CNN, he declared, “That’s why nobody watches CNN anymore. Because they have no credibility.” His comments implied that the network, and by extension its reporters like Collins, are nothing more than partisan mouthpieces for Biden. The president’s attack resonated with his supporters, who have long criticized mainstream media outlets for perceived bias and misinformation.
The verbal exchange did not end with that one remark. Earlier in the briefing, Collins had attempted to challenge Trump on a separate matter when she tried to interject a question about the impact of tariffs on inflation. As Trump held up a signed reciprocal tariff plan, Collins began, “Mr. President, you won the White House in part because of high inflation. If your tariffs make prices go up—” Before she could finish, Trump cut her off sharply, saying, “Excuse me. We haven’t asked you to speak yet.” This interruption set the stage for the later confrontation that became the focal point of the briefing.
Observers noted that Trump’s combative style in this instance was reminiscent of previous encounters where he clashed with the media, but the attack on Collins marked a particularly brutal moment. The president’s choice of words was designed not only to discredit the reporter personally but also to undermine the overall credibility of CNN as an institution. Critics argue that such remarks are emblematic of a broader trend in which Trump seeks to delegitimize media outlets that do not align with his narrative.
Supporters of Trump cheered his comments, praising his willingness to “tell it like it is” and stand up against what they view as the left-leaning bias of major news networks. “Finally, someone is calling out CNN for their partisanship,” one social media user commented. “Trump’s not afraid to speak his mind,” another added. These reactions illustrate the deep divisions that exist between Trump’s base and his detractors, with each side interpreting the president’s words through vastly different lenses.
However, the fallout from Trump’s remarks has been significant. Critics on the other side of the political spectrum argue that his aggressive approach not only disrespects seasoned journalists like Collins but also undermines the fundamental role of the press in holding the government accountable. “It’s unacceptable for a president to attack the free press in such a personal and derogatory manner,” one media watchdog noted. “These kinds of statements erode trust in our democratic institutions.”
The clash between Trump and Collins is likely to fuel ongoing debates about media bias, the limits of presidential rhetoric, and the responsibilities of reporters in a polarized political environment. With social media platforms abuzz and news outlets dissecting every word, the incident has already become a talking point for political pundits and analysts across the spectrum.
As the Oval Office briefing ended, Trump’s unyielding stance left little doubt about his intent to continue challenging the media narratives he finds unfavorable. Whether this latest outburst will have lasting implications for his relationship with the press or influence public opinion remains to be seen. What is clear, however, is that the battle between Trump and his critics is far from over.
In a political climate marked by fierce debates and razor-thin margins of public approval, incidents like these underscore the enduring conflict between the executive branch and the media. For those who support Trump’s outspoken style, his remarks are seen as a necessary corrective to what they perceive as widespread media bias. For his opponents, they represent a troubling disregard for the principles of free speech and journalistic integrity.
The incident unfolded during a press briefing where Trump was fielding questions on the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine. While addressing a question from another reporter about whether he believed President Putin genuinely desired peace, Kaitlan Collins interrupted with her own query: “Do you trust President Putin?” This interjection set off a rapid-fire exchange that would soon escalate into a full-blown media showdown.
Trump’s response to the question about Putin was measured at first. “I believe that—yeah, I believe that he would like to see something happen. I think he would like to see something happen. I think it could have happened a long time ago,” he remarked, seemingly deflecting the inquiry. However, the tone shifted dramatically when he turned his attention to Collins. With pointed emphasis, Trump accused her of having close ties with his political rival, former President Joe Biden. “I know he [Biden] is a friend of yours,” Trump said, his voice rising as he continued his tirade.
Trump didn’t stop there. In a scathing dismissal of CNN, he declared, “That’s why nobody watches CNN anymore. Because they have no credibility.” His comments implied that the network, and by extension its reporters like Collins, are nothing more than partisan mouthpieces for Biden. The president’s attack resonated with his supporters, who have long criticized mainstream media outlets for perceived bias and misinformation.
The verbal exchange did not end with that one remark. Earlier in the briefing, Collins had attempted to challenge Trump on a separate matter when she tried to interject a question about the impact of tariffs on inflation. As Trump held up a signed reciprocal tariff plan, Collins began, “Mr. President, you won the White House in part because of high inflation. If your tariffs make prices go up—” Before she could finish, Trump cut her off sharply, saying, “Excuse me. We haven’t asked you to speak yet.” This interruption set the stage for the later confrontation that became the focal point of the briefing.
Observers noted that Trump’s combative style in this instance was reminiscent of previous encounters where he clashed with the media, but the attack on Collins marked a particularly brutal moment. The president’s choice of words was designed not only to discredit the reporter personally but also to undermine the overall credibility of CNN as an institution. Critics argue that such remarks are emblematic of a broader trend in which Trump seeks to delegitimize media outlets that do not align with his narrative.
Supporters of Trump cheered his comments, praising his willingness to “tell it like it is” and stand up against what they view as the left-leaning bias of major news networks. “Finally, someone is calling out CNN for their partisanship,” one social media user commented. “Trump’s not afraid to speak his mind,” another added. These reactions illustrate the deep divisions that exist between Trump’s base and his detractors, with each side interpreting the president’s words through vastly different lenses.
However, the fallout from Trump’s remarks has been significant. Critics on the other side of the political spectrum argue that his aggressive approach not only disrespects seasoned journalists like Collins but also undermines the fundamental role of the press in holding the government accountable. “It’s unacceptable for a president to attack the free press in such a personal and derogatory manner,” one media watchdog noted. “These kinds of statements erode trust in our democratic institutions.”
The clash between Trump and Collins is likely to fuel ongoing debates about media bias, the limits of presidential rhetoric, and the responsibilities of reporters in a polarized political environment. With social media platforms abuzz and news outlets dissecting every word, the incident has already become a talking point for political pundits and analysts across the spectrum.
As the Oval Office briefing ended, Trump’s unyielding stance left little doubt about his intent to continue challenging the media narratives he finds unfavorable. Whether this latest outburst will have lasting implications for his relationship with the press or influence public opinion remains to be seen. What is clear, however, is that the battle between Trump and his critics is far from over.
In a political climate marked by fierce debates and razor-thin margins of public approval, incidents like these underscore the enduring conflict between the executive branch and the media. For those who support Trump’s outspoken style, his remarks are seen as a necessary corrective to what they perceive as widespread media bias. For his opponents, they represent a troubling disregard for the principles of free speech and journalistic integrity.
According to court filings, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis has been forced to pay more than $54,000 in legal expenses for breaking Georgia’s Open Records Act.
The conflict started when defense lawyer Ashleigh Merchant, who works for Michael Roman, a former campaign and White House advisor to President Donald Trump, asked Willis’ office to produce certain documents. According to Newsweek, Roman and Trump were charged in the Georgia election tampering case, which Willis filed in 2023 and is still pending.
The site added that Friday’s decision is just another blow to Fani Willis’s lawsuit against Trump and the other defendants.
The case against Trump and 18 other co-defendants, who are charged with plotting to thwart Joe Biden’s 2020 Georgia victory, was dismissed from Willis’ prosecution in December. Trump has refuted the allegations and charged Willis with carrying out an attack with political motivations.
Due to the “appearance of impropriety” resulting from Willis’ prior contact with Nathan Wade, a former special prosecutor on the case, the Georgia Court of Appeals determined that disqualification was required. In October, Wade was compelled to step down.
The court disqualified her “based solely upon an appearance of impropriety and absent a finding of an actual conflict of interest or forensic misconduct,” according to Willis’ January appeal to the Georgia Supreme Court.
The judge concluded in the Friday court decision that Merchant’s requests for documents had been “handled differently than other requests” and that the DA’s office had been “openly hostile” to them. This, the judge continued, showed a “lack of good faith.”
According to the court order, Willis now has 30 days to give Merchant all the data that have been requested and pay him $54,264, which represents about 80 hours of labor on the case, Newsweek added.
Merchant had previously claimed that Willis’ office had concealed important records pertaining to Nathan Wade’s job. She also asked for documents outlining the distribution of public cash by Willis’ office.
Separately, in early March, the Georgia Senate approved a law that would permit Trump and his co-defendants to request compensation for their legal costs.
According to Newsweek, the overwhelmingly approved legislation allows counties to pay for legal fees and other expenses when a district attorney is disqualified for misconduct, as long as the case is dismissed.
Attorney Merchant wrote on X in response to the court ruling on Friday: “I’m proud that judges are willing to hold those in authority accountable when they disregard the law!!!”
“No Georgia court has ever disqualified a district attorney for the mere appearance of impropriety without the existence of an actual conflict of interest,” Willis wrote in her January appeal.
In December, Willis was taken out of the case against Trump by the appeals court.
According to the verdict, as Fox News reported, Willis and the assistant DAs in her office now have “no authority to proceed,” but the court did not go so far as to completely dismiss Trump’s indictment.
It is the most recent in Willis’s run of unfavorable legal news. In a case involving an open records litigation, a Georgia judge decided against her in September.
Judge Rachel Krause of Fulton County granted a move that exempts Willis from being named in the complaint directly, enabling her to continue serving in her official role as district attorney, but she denied a plea to dismiss a lawsuit pertaining to open records directed at Willis and her office.
The action, which involved Merchant, was the result of an investigation into election manipulation in Fulton County.
According to Merchant, Willis was hiding documents pertaining to a media monitoring company that was purportedly supported by public funds.
The conflict started when defense lawyer Ashleigh Merchant, who works for Michael Roman, a former campaign and White House advisor to President Donald Trump, asked Willis’ office to produce certain documents. According to Newsweek, Roman and Trump were charged in the Georgia election tampering case, which Willis filed in 2023 and is still pending.
The site added that Friday’s decision is just another blow to Fani Willis’s lawsuit against Trump and the other defendants.
The case against Trump and 18 other co-defendants, who are charged with plotting to thwart Joe Biden’s 2020 Georgia victory, was dismissed from Willis’ prosecution in December. Trump has refuted the allegations and charged Willis with carrying out an attack with political motivations.
Due to the “appearance of impropriety” resulting from Willis’ prior contact with Nathan Wade, a former special prosecutor on the case, the Georgia Court of Appeals determined that disqualification was required. In October, Wade was compelled to step down.
The court disqualified her “based solely upon an appearance of impropriety and absent a finding of an actual conflict of interest or forensic misconduct,” according to Willis’ January appeal to the Georgia Supreme Court.
The judge concluded in the Friday court decision that Merchant’s requests for documents had been “handled differently than other requests” and that the DA’s office had been “openly hostile” to them. This, the judge continued, showed a “lack of good faith.”
According to the court order, Willis now has 30 days to give Merchant all the data that have been requested and pay him $54,264, which represents about 80 hours of labor on the case, Newsweek added.
Merchant had previously claimed that Willis’ office had concealed important records pertaining to Nathan Wade’s job. She also asked for documents outlining the distribution of public cash by Willis’ office.
Separately, in early March, the Georgia Senate approved a law that would permit Trump and his co-defendants to request compensation for their legal costs.
According to Newsweek, the overwhelmingly approved legislation allows counties to pay for legal fees and other expenses when a district attorney is disqualified for misconduct, as long as the case is dismissed.
Attorney Merchant wrote on X in response to the court ruling on Friday: “I’m proud that judges are willing to hold those in authority accountable when they disregard the law!!!”
“No Georgia court has ever disqualified a district attorney for the mere appearance of impropriety without the existence of an actual conflict of interest,” Willis wrote in her January appeal.
In December, Willis was taken out of the case against Trump by the appeals court.
According to the verdict, as Fox News reported, Willis and the assistant DAs in her office now have “no authority to proceed,” but the court did not go so far as to completely dismiss Trump’s indictment.
It is the most recent in Willis’s run of unfavorable legal news. In a case involving an open records litigation, a Georgia judge decided against her in September.
Judge Rachel Krause of Fulton County granted a move that exempts Willis from being named in the complaint directly, enabling her to continue serving in her official role as district attorney, but she denied a plea to dismiss a lawsuit pertaining to open records directed at Willis and her office.
The action, which involved Merchant, was the result of an investigation into election manipulation in Fulton County.
According to Merchant, Willis was hiding documents pertaining to a media monitoring company that was purportedly supported by public funds.